Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios, Puerto Maldonado, Perú
Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios, Puerto Maldonado, Perú
Universidad Andina del Cusco, Puerto Maldonado, Perú
Universidad Andina del Cusco, Puerto Maldonado, Perú
Universidad Andina del Cusco, Puerto Maldonado, Perú
Introduction: Adolescence is a stage of significant physical, emotional, and cognitive changes, where young people face numerous challenges in their daily lives, especially in the educational environment. In this context, self-concept can be a determining factor in how adolescents approach these challenges and meet academic demands.
Objective: To determine the level of self-concept in a sample of Peruvian secondary education students.
Methods: Quantitative, non-experimental, and cross-sectional descriptive study. The sample consisted of 125 students of both genders who were administered the AF-5 Self-Concept Scale, an instrument with adequate psychometric properties. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25 software. A descriptive analysis of the variable and dimensions was performed, focusing on calculating their percentage distributions.
Results: The self-concept of 52% of students was at a regular level, 38.4% at a high level, 5.6% at a very high level, and 4% at a low level. This means that most students recognize some strengths in themselves, but they are also aware of their limitations and areas in which they could improve, a situation that could serve as a solid foundation for working on their personal and academic development.
Conclusions: The level of self-concept characterizing a sample of Peruvian secondary education students was regular. Therefore, it is recommended to implement strategies aimed at strengthening and improving their perception of themselves.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.