Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
×
Español (España) | English
Editorial
Home
Indexing
Conference abstract

Dungeons (ideological) and dragons (cognitive): behavioral sciences and their role in the conceptualization of the climatic crisis

By
Leo Bloise ,
Leo Bloise

Grupo de Filosofía de la Biología, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina.

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

In recent years, numerous publications have appeared that try to generate a framework for the application of neurocognitive knowledge for the resolution of social problems. Under the nickname "behavioral sciences" this field of studies that is presented as deeply interdisciplinary is proposed social. We focus our gaze on certain epistemological and ideological aspects that underlie these initiatives, particularly regarding the conceptualization of the climatic crisis as a problem related to being solved through knowledge generated by cognitive sciences. We observe, exemplify and problematize a series of premises: the behavior of the individual as a terminal expression of an "internal" process in which the environment and by extension the "social" are subordinated in terms of their explanatory hierarchy, as suppliers of stimuli; The simplification of the problems to be solved in terms of biases and cognitive limitations, so that the objectives of the intervention are the behaviors and decisions of individual actors; The appeal to biology as an explanatory support for the validity of the psychological constructs used through the identification of neural correlates and adaptationist narratives on the development of innate cognitive functionalities.

As observed, we maintain that the generation and application of knowledge in this type of initiatives is limited and in turn feeds a marked ideological line, according to which the main causes of the climate crisis are not found in the dynamics and contradictions of the socioeconomic system in force, but in those of individual cognitive systems. That is, conceivable interventions are about the consumption behaviors of individuals, but not on systemic dynamics of production and exploitation.

How to Cite

1.
Bloise L. Dungeons (ideological) and dragons (cognitive): behavioral sciences and their role in the conceptualization of the climatic crisis. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 20 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];2:130. Available from: https://conferencias.saludcyt.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/130

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.