Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
×
Español (España) | English
Editorial
Home
Indexing
Conference abstract

Comparative Analysis of Acrylic Methods in Orthodontics to Improve Treatment Quality

By
Johanna Elizabeth Fiallos Sánchez ,
Johanna Elizabeth Fiallos Sánchez

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Matriz Ambato, Ecuador

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
José Arturo Molina ,
José Arturo Molina

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Matriz Ambato, Ecuador

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Jonathan Steven Moreta Ocaña ,
Jonathan Steven Moreta Ocaña

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes, Matriz Ambato, Ecuador

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

The acrylization of oral orthopedic devices should be performed by dental mechanic’s professionals, as it requires experience and precision to achieve optimal results. This study focused on evaluating and comparing the bulk and salt-and-pepper acrylization techniques used in the fabrication of oral orthopedic devices. An observational qualitative study was conducted with two groups of 10 third-semester mechanical students. The results showed that Veracril acrylic, due to its ease of handling and polymerization without thermal treatment, is more suitable. Additionally, improvements in acrylization and polishing practices were suggested to optimize the strength, durability, and comfort of the devices. The study concludes that the bulk technique with Veracril provides better finishing quality and shorter manufacturing time, thus proposing an improved laboratory procedure guide in orthodontics for future applications

How to Cite

1.
Fiallos Sánchez JE, Molina JA, Moreta Ocaña JS. Comparative Analysis of Acrylic Methods in Orthodontics to Improve Treatment Quality. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 20 [cited 2024 Jul. 5];2:938. Available from: https://conferencias.saludcyt.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/938

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.