Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Español (España) | English
Editorial
Revistas / Journals
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Home
Issue
Current Issue Previous Issues Thematic issues
About
About the Journal Editorial Team Privacy Statement Contact
Author Guidelines
Guidelines for authors Peer Review Process Open Access Policy and Copyright Digital preservation policy Ethical aspects Anti-plagiarism policy Crossmark policy page
Indexing
×
Español (España) | English
Editorial

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Home

Current Issue Previous Issues Thematic issues

About the Journal Editorial Team Privacy Statement Contact

Guidelines for authors Peer Review Process Open Access Policy and Copyright Digital preservation policy Ethical aspects Anti-plagiarism policy Crossmark policy page
Indexing
Conference abstract
Published: 2023-04-19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202384

Construction of discourse coherence and emotions of the comprehender: emotional regulation strategies and decision-making in stressful situations

By
Leila Medina ,
Leila Medina

Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Argentina.

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Pablo Nicolás Fernandez Larrosa ,
Pablo Nicolás Fernandez Larrosa

Laboratorio de la Conciencia. IFIBYNE, UBA-CONICET. Argentina.

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Jazmín Cevasco ,
Jazmín Cevasco

Instituto de Investigaciones. UBA-CONICET. Aregntina.

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

It is common for university students to find themselves in stressful situations related to the need to comprehend discourse and make decisions in relation to their learning. Therefore, emotional regulation is key. These concepts have been widely studied in recent years, but their interplay has not been thoroughly examined. Considering this gap, this paper aims to review the literature and analyze the role of stress and emotional regulation strategies in the impact of cognitive processing involved in decision-making and discourse coherence construction.

To this end, we will first present and describe studies on how stress and emotional regulation affect cognitive processing. Then, we will focus on decision-making processes. Finally, we will analyze the role of emotions, emotional regulation, and stress in the construction of discourse coherence. Finally, we will present conclusions and pending questions for future research.

Keywords:

Discourse,
Emotion,
Decision Making,
Emotional Regulation,

How to Cite

1.
Medina L, Fernandez Larrosa PN, Cevasco J. Construction of discourse coherence and emotions of the comprehender: emotional regulation strategies and decision-making in stressful situations. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 19 [cited 2024 Jul. 5];2:84. Available from: https://conferencias.saludcyt.ar/index.php/sctconf/article/view/84

Copyright Notice

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

IV Jornadas de Fundamentos y Aplicaciones de la Interdisciplina (JFAI2023)
Vol. 2 (2023)
See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.