Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina
A sign of transdisciplinarity is being able to read between the lines, since what is not made explicit, what is not said with all the letter is captured. Whoever seeks clarity should seek contradictions, complementarities, between reason and passion, between different reasons, between quantitative and qualitative approaches, analogical and digital methods, between pluri, inter and transdisciplinary parts. Nicolescu introduces meaning into science, through its dimensions of meaning, anti-sense, and lack of meaning. It is the responsibility of each one to self-generate, in this case, the method itself. Faith allows the jump between levels of reality and knowledge, to build bridges between knowledge, without the need to appropriate them. It is worth asking, in each knowledge, what has remained, and what has changed, and what could change or remain when related to other knowledge. It should be noted which limits characterize the sciences with which a discipline is related. A level of reality that is not traversed is an epistemological obstacle that has been overcome. Does science develop the causes of its denial, claiming the help of the doxa? Did scientific problems give way to transdisciplinary problems? Transdisciplinarity should not exist, since it turns the idea into an object, into a discipline, and transdisciplinarity should give way to transdisciplinary, the verb that puts us into action to seek bridges and relationships. The results are the product of the interaction
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.